Collation argument for create managed instance#5008
Conversation
|
@NMijat1024 Please squash your commits into a single commit |
dsgouda
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good, please squash commits
|
@azuresdkci retest this please |
64cf23b to
9708cb8
Compare
|
@dsgouda Looks better now |
|
@azuresdkci retest this please |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Was this autogenerated or edited by hand?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@fearthecowboy Is such encoding expected in generated code?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What's the problem? It has changed < and > to { and }. The braces don't need to be xml escaped.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please update the changes introduced here to the PackageReleaseNotes in csproj
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is also auto generated. Should I revert all the changes that are not tied to my feature?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please do not revert any files.
Since autogenerating from the latest changes introduces these changes, they must be recorded in the PackageReleaseNotes
Please consult with @jaredmoo regarding this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Weird, did autorest remove this constructor?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@fearthecowboy Here is the PR which used preview version of autorest. #5029
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks like that deletes the constructor too
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I already signed off several days ago, I don't have the ability to merge.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I wanted to make sure this doesn't adversely affect customers. SInce this is preview, it should be OK to merge this
jaredmoo
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please update PackageReleaseNotes in Microsoft.Azure.Management.Sql.csproj
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What's the problem? It has changed < and > to { and }. The braces don't need to be xml escaped.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Weird, did autorest remove this constructor?
Add package release notes
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@jaredmoo not just the constructor but these changes too
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It looks like autorest is being weird and shuffling the methods around the file
9708cb8 to
4de65ce
Compare
Description
Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#4314
This checklist is used to make sure that common guidelines for a pull request are followed.
General Guidelines
Testing Guidelines
SDK Generation Guidelines
*.csprojandAssemblyInfo.csfiles have been updated with the new version of the SDK.